
Tesla Modifies FSD Contracts to Include 'Supervised' Language
Updated June 9, 2026
3 min read
1 linked source
Tesla has retroactively updated Full Self-Driving (FSD) contracts signed by owners between 2016 and early 2024 to include the term 'supervised,' which was not present in the original agreements. This change raises concerns among owners who expected unsupervised autonomy as part of their purchase. In some cases, the original documents have become inaccessible, complicating the situation for affected owners.
Share this story
Why it matters
- ✓Owners may feel misled about the capabilities of the FSD package they purchased, impacting their trust in Tesla.
- ✓The change could affect the perceived value of the FSD package, potentially influencing resale value.
- ✓Accessibility to original contract terms is now in question, which may complicate legal recourse for owners.
Reporting notes
EV Signal briefs are written to explain the verified change first, then add the context EV buyers and owners need to understand cost, availability, charging access, eligibility, or ownership impact.
If details are still developing, we try to say what is confirmed, what comes from secondary reporting, and what readers should verify before acting.
Source mix
1 linked source
1 media
Reviewed from: Electrek.
Tesla Modifies FSD Contracts to Include 'Supervised' Language
Tesla has made a significant change to the Full Self-Driving (FSD) contracts that many owners signed between 2016 and early 2024. The company has retroactively added the term 'supervised' to these agreements, which was not part of the original documents. This alteration raises questions about the expectations of autonomy that owners had when they purchased the FSD package, as it was previously marketed without any mention of supervision.
What Changed
The core of this update is the addition of the word 'supervised' to the FSD purchase agreements. According to Electrek, this modification has been confirmed by multiple Tesla owners who are now facing contracts that imply a level of oversight that was not originally disclosed. The contracts in question were sold under the premise of 'Full Self-Driving Capability,' which suggested a promise of unsupervised driving autonomy. In some instances, the original documents have become entirely inaccessible, further complicating the matter for affected owners.
Why It Matters for Buyers/Owners
This change has several implications for current and potential Tesla owners:
- Trust and Transparency: Owners may feel misled about the capabilities of the FSD package they purchased, which could damage their trust in Tesla as a company. This feeling of being misinformed could lead to dissatisfaction among current users.
- Value Perception: The introduction of 'supervised' could affect the perceived value of the FSD package. If owners believe they are not receiving the level of autonomy they initially expected, it may influence their decision to keep the package or consider resale options.
- Legal and Contractual Complications: With the original contract terms now in question, owners may face challenges in seeking legal recourse or clarifications regarding their rights and the product they purchased. The inaccessibility of original documents could hinder their ability to contest the changes.
Key Details from Source Material
Electrek's report highlights that the contracts were signed during a period when Tesla was actively marketing the FSD package as capable of fully autonomous driving. The absence of the term 'supervised' in these agreements implies that owners were led to believe they were purchasing a product that would eventually allow for unsupervised driving. The retroactive modification of these contracts raises concerns about the ethical implications of such changes and the potential for legal disputes.
What to Watch Next
As this situation develops, it will be crucial to monitor how Tesla responds to owner concerns regarding the changes to the FSD contracts. Potential legal challenges from affected owners may arise, and it will be interesting to see if Tesla provides additional clarifications or support for those impacted. Furthermore, the broader implications for Tesla's marketing practices and customer relations could become a focal point in discussions about the company's transparency and accountability.
In summary, Tesla's retroactive addition of 'supervised' to FSD contracts has raised significant concerns among owners who expected unsupervised autonomy. As the situation unfolds, it will be important for current and prospective Tesla owners to stay informed about any further developments.
Sources
These are the documents and reports used to build this brief so readers can verify the story directly.
Comments
Log in with
Loading comments…
More in Ownership

EV Emissions Advantage Varies by Location, Study Finds
A recent MIT-led study reveals that electric vehicles (EVs) generally produce lower emissions than…
1h ago

GM Expands Energy Strategy with Sodium-Ion Batteries and Vehicle-to-Grid Technology
General Motors is advancing its energy strategy by integrating sodium-ion batteries and…
1h ago

Driving Strategy Boosts Plug-In Hybrid Fuel Economy to 50 MPG
A change in driving strategy has allowed a Volvo wagon owner to increase their plug-in hybrid's…
1h ago

Shell Plans to Sell Offshore Wind Assets in Potential $1 Billion Deal
Shell is reportedly looking to divest its offshore wind farm assets, with the potential sale…
13h ago